{"id":642,"date":"2021-10-06T04:17:45","date_gmt":"2021-10-06T04:17:45","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/srmphomesc.in\/?page_id=642"},"modified":"2021-10-11T09:58:17","modified_gmt":"2021-10-11T09:58:17","slug":"criterion-2","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/srmphomesc.in\/?page_id=642","title":{"rendered":"Criterion 2"},"content":{"rendered":"

Criterion 2 \u2013 Teaching-learning and Evaluation<\/h3>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Metric No.<\/th>\nDescription<\/th>\nSSR Documents<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
2.1 Student Enrolment and Profile<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
2.1.1 (Qn<\/sub>M)<\/td>\nEnrolment percentage (Average of last five years)
\nNumber of students admitted year wise during last five years
\nNumber of sanctioned seats year wise during last five years<\/td>\n		\n
2.1.2 (Qn<\/sub>M)<\/td>\nSeats filled against seats reserved for various categories ( SC, ST, OBC, Divyangjan, etc. as per applicable reservation policy) during the last five years<\/td>\n\n
2.2 Catering to Student Diversity<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
2.2.1 (Ql<\/sub>M)<\/td>\nThe institution assesses the learning levels of the students and organizes special Programmes for advanced learners and slow learners<\/td>\n\n
2.2.2 (Qn<\/sub>M)<\/td>\nStudent- Full time teacher ratio (Data for the latest completed academic year)<\/td>\n\n
2.3 Teaching-Learning Process<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
2.3.1 (Ql<\/sub>M)<\/td>\nStudent centric methods, such as experiential learning, participative learning and problem solving methodologies are used for enhancing learning experiences<\/td>\n\n
2.3.2 (Ql<\/sub>M)<\/td>\nTeachers use ICT enabled tools for effective teaching-learning process<\/td>\n\n
2.3.3 (Qn<\/sub>M)<\/td>\nMentor for academic and other related issues (Data for the latest completed academic year )<\/td>\n\n
2.4 Teacher Profile and Quality<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
2.4.1 (Qn<\/sub>M)<\/td>\nFull time teachers against sanctioned posts during the last five years<\/td>\n\n
2.4.2 (Qn<\/sub>M)<\/td>\nFull time teachers with Ph. D. \/ D.M. \/ M.Ch. \/ D.N.B Superspeciality \/ D.Sc. \/ D.Litt. during the last five years (consider only highest degree for count)<\/td>\n\n
2.4.3 (Qn<\/sub>M)<\/td>\nTeaching experience of full time teachers in the same institution (Data for the latest completed academic year in number of years)<\/td>\n\n
2.5 Evaluation Process and Reforms<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
2.5.1 (Ql<\/sub>M)<\/td>\nMechanism of internal assessment is transparent and robust in terms of frequency and mode<\/td>\n\n
2.5.2 (Ql<\/sub>M)<\/td>\nMechanism to deal with internal\/external examination related grievances is transparent, time- bound and efficient<\/td>\n\n
2.6 Student Performance and Learning Outcomes<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
2.6.1 (Ql<\/sub>M)<\/td>\nProgramme and course outcomes for all Programmes offered by the institution are stated and displayed on website and communicated to teachers and students<\/td>\n\n
2.6.2 (Ql<\/sub>M)<\/td>\nAttainment of programme outcomes and course outcomes are evaluated by the institution<\/td>\n\n
2.6.3 (Qn<\/sub>M)<\/td>\nPass percentage of Students during last five years
\n2.6.3.1. Total number of final year students who passed the university examination year wise during the last five years
\n2.6.3.2. Total number of final year students who appeared for the university examination year wise during the last five years<\/td>\n		\n
2.7 Student Satisfaction Survey<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
2.7.1 (Qn<\/sub>M)<\/td>\nOnline student satisfaction survey regarding to teaching learning process. (online survey to be conducted )<\/td>\n\n